The Growing Interdependency of the World Economy: How Customary International Law Plays a Role
The Growing Interdependency of the World Economy: How Customary International Law Plays a Role
February 23, 2021
5:00 pm (PST)
Please join us to explore the origins of customary international law (CIL) as part of the law of Canada, the circumstances under which a nation can exert jurisdiction outside its territory and the impact of business and citizens of purported extraterritorial jurisdiction.
The past decade has witnessed an increase in attempts to regulate overseas conduct. In Nevsun, the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada re-affirmed that CIL is also the law of Canada and it must be treated with the same respect as any other law. CIL recognizes that there are limitations on jurisdiction over extraterritorial conduct. Under CIL, countries are limited in their assertion of jurisdiction to those cases where there can be established a substantial and genuine connection to the home jurisdiction. This limit is derived from duties of each country to respect the sovereignty of other countries.
While commentators have largely focused on the significance of Nevsun for transnational human rights litigation, it is worth contemplating the wider and deeper ripples in the legal landscape that this decision may yet produce. How might customary international law come into play when environmental accidents occur outside Canadian territory? What are the evolving expectations and responsibilities with respect to climate change in customary international law? Why might it matter that many UNDRIP provisions constitute customary international law? And what are the new demands on legal counsel tasked with advising clients in fast-moving transnational legal contexts where public and private international law are increasingly intermingled?
Webinar panelists will provide insights on:
- The practical implications of CIL on Canadian citizens and businesses
- How CIL can restrict the application of extraterritorial laws
- How Canadian businesses and individuals could be subject to torts based on international human rights violations and environmental incidents in Canadian courts
Panelists:
Natasha Affolder
Professor
Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia
Joanna Harrington
Professor and Eldon Foote Chair in Law
Faculty of Law, University of Alberta
Ted L McDorman
Professor
Faculty of Law, University of Victoria
Asad Kiyani
Assistant Professor
Faculty of Law, University of Victoria
Moderators:
Stephen Wortley
Partner, Capital Markets & Securities
TRC-Sadovod LLP
Date: | Tuesday, February 23, 2021 |
Time: | 5:00 pm (PST) |
Access: | Viewing instructions will be sent via email to those who RSVP to attend. |
RSVP |
For more information, please contact: [email protected]
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Update! Court Ordered Charges can also prime Crown Claims in BIA matters
Canadian courts have now confirmed the priority of claims between Statutory Deemed Trusts and Court-Ordered Charges.
Supreme Court of Canada Rules Impact Assessment Act Unconstitutional: Implications and Future Directions
Overview of the Supreme Court's ruling of the constitutionality of the Impact Assessment Act and its implications on the energy and natural resource sectors.
Secret Recordings Won’t Fly: BC Court of Appeal Rules on Surreptitious Recordings by Employees in the Workplace
This bulletin discusses a recent BC Court of Appeal decision where an employee was dismissed for cause for secretly recording workplace conversations.
Reminder: New Requirements to Publish Wage Information under the Pay Transparency Act
As if November 1, 2023, employers will be required to disclose the expected salary or wage in all publicly advertised job listings.
Canada & Taiwan Conclude Foreign Investment Protection Arrangement
Canada-Taiwan FIPA Latest Milestone in Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.