Can Canada and China still learn from each other? Balancing Research Partnerships, National Security and Economic Competitiveness
Can Canada and China still learn from each other? Balancing Research Partnerships, National Security and Economic Competitiveness
The future of the relationship between Canada and China is back in the news — but what does that mean for Canadian researchers who have been warned about too-close ties to Beijing?
The release of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor and the resolution of the U.S.-based case against Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou has resolved one tension point between Canada and the emerging super power.
In this webinar, we will explore how international research partnerships have become tangled in the complex web of national security and economic competitiveness. We will ask Canadian academics who have done work with China and who those who understand the Canada-China relationship to share their insights and thoughts on what comes next when academic interests and geopolitics collide. The session will operate under Chatham House Rules to allow for frank, open discussion.
The Background
The panel will explore the ramifications of an outreach program launched by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) in April 2020.
At the time, CSIS warned Canadian universities and researchers to be on alert for international espionage and foreign interference targeting their research and data— from partnerships that could compromise intellectual property to the possible presence of foreign agents in labs. CSIS then identified research areas that may be considered sensitive or dual-use, which included quantum computing, advanced electronics and engineering, vaccines, chemistry and artificial intelligence.
In May 2021, Alberta ordered its four major universities to suspend the pursuit of any new or renewed partnerships linked to China. It also asked them to undertake a thorough review of their institutions’ relationships with any potentially linked entities.
In July 2021, the Canadian government rolled out new national security guidelines for research partnerships and risk assessment protocols for universities applying for additional funding through the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Alliance Grants Program.
The actions by CSIS and Canadian governments have raised important questions about academic freedom, openness and competitiveness. They have also prompted examination of the effects on the private sector, which relies on public-private collaboration to fuel innovation and growth.
Supporters of academic freedom are worrying about the effect of undermining legitimate partnerships as well as an open and collaborative research environment. However, there are growing concerns and calls for developing a new strategy for securing national research.
Webinar panelists and commentators will provide insights on:
- How has the release of the “two Michaels” and the return of Meng Wanzhou affected the Canada-China relationship?
- Is national security a threat to academic freedom or vice versa?
- How do we strike the right balance between Canada’s national security obligations and the needs of researchers to engage with partners around the world?
- Can academic research and international collaboration be conducted outside of geopolitical considerations?
- Are there other examples we can learn from? Other successful collaborations by academics while national geopolitics would suggest otherwise?
- Are there “best practices” for universities and researchers who conduct research partnerships with the private sector and international partners to follow?
Date: | Monday, October 18, 2021 |
Time: | 9:00 am PST/ 12:00 pm EST |
Webinar: | Log-in details will be e-mailed a couple days before the webinar |
CPD: | This event qualifies for 1.5 CPD credits |
Panelists:
Paul Evans | Jie Cheng |
HSBC Professor of Asian Research School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia |
Associate Professor Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia |
Gordon Houlden | Christopher Parsons |
Director Emeritus of the China Institute Professor of Political Science University of Alberta |
Senior Research Associate Citizen Lab, Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto |
Commentators:
Victor V. Ramraj | Ron Hoffmann |
Professor, Director of the Centre for Asia Pacific Initiatives University of Victoria |
Special Advisor, Asia-Pacific & Major Projects Invest Alberta |
Opening Remarks:
Carol Liao |
Stephen Wortley |
Director of the Centre for Business Law Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia |
Partner, Capital Markets & Securities TRC-Sadovod LLP |
For more information, please contact [email protected].
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Enforcing Arbitration Agreements: Ontario Superior Court Raises a ‘Clause’ for Concern
This bulletin discusses a recent decision that found that an arbitration clause that contracts out of applicable employment standards legislation is invalid.
Transparency for Talent: Proposed Legislation Would Mandate Salary Range and Artificial Intelligence Disclosure in Hiring Process
Ontario will propose legislation aimed at providing additional transparency to Ontario workers, including salary ranges and use of artificial intelligence.
Environmental Obligations Trump Lenders: The Trend Continues
Re Mantle Materials Group, Ltd continues a recent trend in Alberta in which environmental remediation obligations are found to have a super priority.
A New Intelligence Creeps into the Capital Markets
On October 10, 2023, the OSC and EY jointly released a report on the use of artificial intelligence in Ontario's capital markets.
An Update on Cross Border Data Transfers in Canada and the EU
This webinar will feature presentations about key and emerging issues involving the transfer of personal information within and outside of the European Union and Canada.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.